IVV vs MYMF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MYMF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.45% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 70 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +1.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +2.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -2.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2024 |
IVV vs MYMF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while MYMF returned +2.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 1.04% for MYMF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.2% for MYMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -2.0% for MYMF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MYMF charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.45% for MYMF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MYMF share 0 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MYMF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MYMF charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MYMF?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +2.30% for MYMF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +2.38% for MYMF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MYMF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.2% for MYMF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MYMF -2.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and MYMF?
IVV and MYMF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MYMF?
IVV and MYMF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MYMF?
IVV yields 1.10% while MYMF yields 2.45%, so MYMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.