IVV vs NEAR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. NEAR offers more diversification with 1,622 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NEAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $4.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.43% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,622 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -1.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +0.41% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +4.37% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +3.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -9.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 25, 2013 |
IVV vs NEAR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while NEAR returned +0.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 1.11% for NEAR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +4.37% for NEAR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +3.37% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.6% for NEAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -9.6% for NEAR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NEAR charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.43% for NEAR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NEAR share 2 holdings out of 1331 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NEAR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NEAR charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NEAR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +0.41% for NEAR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +2.20% for NEAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NEAR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.6% for NEAR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NEAR -9.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NEAR?
IVV and NEAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NEAR?
IVV and NEAR share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1331 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NEAR?
IVV yields 1.10% while NEAR yields 4.43%, so NEAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.