IVV vs NERD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill Video Games ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NERD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.40% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 46 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | -8.59% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | -17.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +15.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | -3.63% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -65.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 3, 2019 |
IVV vs NERD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill Video Games ETF (NERD) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while NERD returned -17.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a loss of 8.59% for NERD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +15.19% for NERD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and -3.63% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NERD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -65.6% for NERD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NERD charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.40% for NERD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NERD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NERD charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NERD?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs -17.11% for NERD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +6.37% for NERD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NERD?
NERD has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NERD -65.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NERD?
IVV and NERD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NERD?
IVV and NERD share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 543 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NERD?
IVV yields 1.09% while NERD yields 1.40%, so NERD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.