IVV vs NIKL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Which is better, IVV or NIKL?
Large Cap Blend against Commodities.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NIKL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.66% |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -13.69% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +10.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | -1.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 32.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -59.0% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $20,369Best | $9,100 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 75.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Sprott ETFS |
| Category | Equity | Commodity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Commodities |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 21, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 22, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.5 years).
IVV vs NIKL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NIKL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while NIKL returned +10.86%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 13.69% for NIKL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against -1.25% for NIKL. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.54% annualized vs -2.66%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NIKL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.7% compared with 12.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -59.0% for NIKL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NIKL charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.66% for NIKL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 27 in NIKL, totalling 99.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 27 in NIKL, against full books of 508 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for NIKL that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.2% of the fund), and 482 for IVV that do not appear in NIKL (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NIKL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NIKL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NIKL charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NIKL?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +10.86% for NIKL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +22.54% vs -2.66% for NIKL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NIKL?
NIKL has been the more volatile fund at 32.7% annualized versus 12.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs NIKL -59.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and NIKL?
IVV and NIKL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NIKL?
IVV yields 1.06% while NIKL yields 2.66%, so NIKL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NIKL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.