IVV vs NMAR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Innovator Growth 100 Power Buffer ETF - March
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NMAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $93M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +10.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +15.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 3, 2025 |
IVV vs NMAR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Growth 100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while NMAR returned +15.01%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 10.40% for NMAR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.1% for NMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.0% for NMAR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for NMAR.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NMAR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NMAR charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NMAR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +15.01% for NMAR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +16.96% for NMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NMAR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.1% for NMAR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NMAR -10.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and NMAR?
IVV and NMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NMAR?
IVV yields 1.09% while NMAR yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.