IVV vs NMB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Simplify National Muni Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NMB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.52% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $48M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.09% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 37 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +1.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +6.28% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 9, 2024 |
IVV vs NMB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify National Muni Bond ETF (NMB) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while NMB returned +6.28%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 1.30% for NMB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for NMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.7% for NMB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NMB charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $52 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.09% for NMB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NMB share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NMB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NMB charges 0.52%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NMB?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +6.28% for NMB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +3.81% for NMB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NMB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for NMB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NMB -13.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and NMB?
IVV and NMB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NMB?
IVV and NMB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NMB?
IVV yields 1.09% while NMB yields 5.09%, so NMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.