IVV vs NOCT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NOCT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $226M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +9.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +13.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +14.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +10.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 1, 2019 |
IVV vs NOCT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while NOCT returned +13.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 9.78% for NOCT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +14.78% for NOCT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +10.35% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, NOCT has the edge at +11.18% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.1% for NOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.2% for NOCT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NOCT charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for NOCT.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NOCT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NOCT charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NOCT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +13.47% for NOCT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +11.18% for NOCT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NOCT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.1% for NOCT. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NOCT -16.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and NOCT?
IVV and NOCT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NOCT?
IVV yields 1.09% while NOCT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.