IVV vs NORW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X MSCI Norway ETF
Which is better, IVV or NORW?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y and the full window, NORW over 1Y and 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NORW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $96M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 6.77% |
| Holdings | 508 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +32.36%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +35.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | +22.61%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +8.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 19.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -42.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $15,023 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 58.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 9, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 19, 2009 to Sep 10, 2026 (17.1 years).
IVV vs NORW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NORW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while NORW returned +35.12%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 32.36% for NORW.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +22.61% for NORW; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +8.48% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.13% annualized vs +7.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NORW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 14.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -42.6% for NORW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NORW charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 6.77% for NORW.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 59 in NORW, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 59 in NORW, against full books of 508 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for NORW that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.2% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in NORW (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NORW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NORW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NORW charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NORW?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +35.12% for NORW, so NORW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IVV annualized +13.13% vs +7.27% for NORW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NORW?
NORW has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 14.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs NORW -42.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NORW?
IVV and NORW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NORW?
IVV yields 1.06% while NORW yields 6.77%, so NORW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NORW better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y and the full window, NORW over 1Y and 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.