IVV vs NTRL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Equity Market Neutral ETF
Which is better, IVV or NTRL?
Large Cap Blend against Market Neutral Strategy.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NTRL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.88% |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -9.9%Best | -25.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,945Best | $8,467 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Market Neutral Strategy |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 4, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 698 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 30, 2026 and NTRL through Nov 1, 2024.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 25, 2023 to Nov 1, 2024 (1.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.9% for IVV and -25.2% for NTRL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NTRL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.88% for NTRL.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 2 in NTRL, totalling 99.3% and 0.0% of the two funds. That is not enough of NTRL to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 2 in NTRL, against full books of 508 and 24.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NTRL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOLXHologic Inc Common Stock Usd 0% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NTRL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NTRL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NTRL charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NTRL?
IVV yields 1.06% while NTRL yields 2.88%, so NTRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTRL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.