IVV vs NVBU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF
Which is better, IVV or NVBU?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NVBU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.74% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +7.47% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +10.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 8.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,713Best | $12,413 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianzIM |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.9 years).
IVV vs NVBU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NVBU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while NVBU returned +10.61%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 7.47% for NVBU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 8.7% for NVBU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -12.0% for NVBU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVBU charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for NVBU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NVBU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NVBU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVBU charges 0.74%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NVBU?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +10.61% for NVBU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.08% vs +12.05% for NVBU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NVBU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 8.7% for NVBU. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs NVBU -12.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and NVBU?
IVV and NVBU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVBU?
IVV yields 1.06% while NVBU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NVBU better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.