IVV vs NVDB

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNVDBWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.95%
AUM$865.2B$8M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.60%
Holdings5084
YTD Return+13.80%+13.04%
1Y Return+23.01%+17.83%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.77%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.39%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-42.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 8, 2025

IVV vs NVDB Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra NVDA ETF (NVDB) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while NVDB returned +17.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 13.04% for NVDB.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.9% for NVDB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVDB charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.60% for NVDB.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NVDB?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVDB charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or NVDB?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +17.83% for NVDB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVDB?

IVV yields 1.09% while NVDB yields 1.60%, so NVDB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.