IVV vs NVDS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NVDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $17M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 17.46% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | -28.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | -36.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | -63.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 53.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -99.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tradr ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 13, 2022 |
IVV vs NVDS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while NVDS returned -36.00%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a loss of 28.82% for NVDS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against -63.56% for NVDS. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -68.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -99.4% for NVDS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVDS charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $115 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 17.46% for NVDS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NVDS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVDS charges 1.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NVDS?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs -36.00% for NVDS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -68.68% for NVDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NVDS?
NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 53.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NVDS -99.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and NVDS?
IVV and NVDS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVDS?
IVV yields 1.09% while NVDS yields 17.46%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.