IVV vs NVDS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or NVDS?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.69, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.15% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $17M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 21.23% |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -32.86% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -42.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | -64.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3%Best | 53.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | - |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $21,453Best | $81 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 13, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.2 years).
IVV vs NVDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NVDS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while NVDS returned -42.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 32.86% for NVDS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against -64.14% for NVDS. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +19.93% annualized vs -68.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.1% compared with 14.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVDS charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $115 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 21.23% for NVDS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NVDS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NVDS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVDS charges 1.15%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NVDS?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -42.17% for NVDS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +19.93% vs -68.21% for NVDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NVDS?
NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 53.1% annualized versus 14.3% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and NVDS?
IVV and NVDS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVDS?
IVV yields 1.06% while NVDS yields 21.23%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NVDS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.69, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.