IVV vs NVDW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NVDW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $119M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 62.84% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -3.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +3.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 45.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -37.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 19, 2025 |
IVV vs NVDW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while NVDW returned +3.26%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 3.80% for NVDW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NVDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -37.2% for NVDW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NVDW charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 62.84% for NVDW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NVDW share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NVDW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.76% | 16.60% | 8.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NVDW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NVDW charges 1.00%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NVDW?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +3.26% for NVDW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +32.24% for NVDW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NVDW?
NVDW has been the more volatile fund at 45.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NVDW -37.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and NVDW?
IVV and NVDW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NVDW?
IVV and NVDW share 1 common holdings with a 7.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NVDW?
IVV yields 1.10% while NVDW yields 62.84%, so NVDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.