IVV vs OCIO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Clearshares Ocio Etf
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OCIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $176M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 9.88% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 71 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +9.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +16.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +13.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +7.09% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ClearShares ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 26, 2017 |
IVV vs OCIO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Clearshares Ocio Etf (OCIO) is a ETF from ClearShares ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while OCIO returned +16.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 9.22% for OCIO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +13.81% for OCIO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +7.09% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.1% for OCIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.2% for OCIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OCIO charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 9.88% for OCIO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OCIO share 19 holdings out of 541 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OCIO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OCIO charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OCIO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +16.40% for OCIO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +6.99% for OCIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OCIO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.1% for OCIO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OCIO -24.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and OCIO?
IVV and OCIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OCIO?
IVV and OCIO share 19 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 541 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OCIO?
IVV yields 1.10% while OCIO yields 9.88%, so OCIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.