IVV vs OMAH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OMAH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.98% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 15.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 91 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +7.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +10.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -11.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VistaShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 5, 2025 |
IVV vs OMAH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is a ETF from VistaShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while OMAH returned +10.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 7.56% for OMAH.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.7% for OMAH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -11.8% for OMAH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OMAH charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $98 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 15.00% for OMAH.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OMAH share 16 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OMAH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OMAH charges 0.98%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OMAH?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +10.37% for OMAH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +10.07% for OMAH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OMAH?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.7% for OMAH. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OMAH -11.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and OMAH?
IVV and OMAH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OMAH?
IVV and OMAH share 16 common holdings with a 15.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OMAH?
IVV yields 1.10% while OMAH yields 15.00%, so OMAH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.