IVV vs ONEZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ONEZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.98% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $335M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.67% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 15 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +8.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +8.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TrueShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 27, 2025 |
IVV vs ONEZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETF (ONEZ) is a ETF from TrueShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while ONEZ returned +8.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 8.58% for ONEZ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.8% for ONEZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.2% for ONEZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ONEZ charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $98 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.67% for ONEZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ONEZ share 0 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ONEZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ONEZ charges 0.98%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ONEZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +8.90% for ONEZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +8.82% for ONEZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ONEZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.8% for ONEZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ONEZ -13.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and ONEZ?
IVV and ONEZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ONEZ?
IVV and ONEZ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ONEZ?
IVV yields 1.09% while ONEZ yields 3.67%, so ONEZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.