IVV vs OTGL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs OTG Latin America ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OTGL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $28M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.73% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 58 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +5.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +17.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | World Funds Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 14, 2025 |
IVV vs OTGL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) is a ETF from World Funds Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while OTGL returned +17.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 5.52% for OTGL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.8% for OTGL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.5% for OTGL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OTGL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.73% for OTGL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OTGL share 1 holdings out of 553 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in OTGL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVX | 0.55% | 0.75% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OTGL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OTGL charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OTGL?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +17.16% for OTGL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +18.45% for OTGL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OTGL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.8% for OTGL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OTGL -13.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and OTGL?
IVV and OTGL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OTGL?
IVV and OTGL share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 553 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OTGL?
IVV yields 1.10% while OTGL yields 2.73%, so OTGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.