IVV vs OVF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OVF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.83% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $49M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 10.55% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +9.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +16.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +17.01% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +7.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -30.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Overlay Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 30, 2019 |
IVV vs OVF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF) is a ETF from Overlay Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while OVF returned +16.20%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 9.29% for OVF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +17.01% for OVF; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +7.42% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, OVF has the edge at +7.80% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -30.1% for OVF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OVF charges 0.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $83 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 10.55% for OVF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OVF share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OVF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OVF charges 0.83%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OVF?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +16.20% for OVF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +7.80% for OVF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OVF?
OVF has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OVF -30.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and OVF?
IVV and OVF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OVF?
IVV and OVF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OVF?
IVV yields 1.09% while OVF yields 10.55%, so OVF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.