IVV vs OVL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OVL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $398M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 7.41% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +7.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +17.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +20.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +11.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -35.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Overlay Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 30, 2019 |
IVV vs OVL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) is a ETF from Overlay Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while OVL returned +17.02%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 7.62% for OVL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +20.92% for OVL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +11.44% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, OVL has the edge at +16.25% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.5% for OVL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OVL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 7.41% for OVL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OVL share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OVL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OVL charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OVL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +17.02% for OVL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +16.25% for OVL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OVL?
OVL has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OVL -35.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and OVL?
IVV and OVL have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OVL?
IVV and OVL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OVL?
IVV yields 1.10% while OVL yields 7.41%, so OVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.