IVV vs OVT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OVT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $62M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 7.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -0.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -0.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +5.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +1.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 5.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Overlay Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 14, 2021 |
IVV vs OVT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) is a ETF from Overlay Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while OVT returned -0.06%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 0.97% for OVT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +5.40% for OVT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +1.61% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.1% for OVT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.6% for OVT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OVT charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 7.08% for OVT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OVT share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OVT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OVT charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OVT?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -0.06% for OVT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +1.89% for OVT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OVT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.1% for OVT. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OVT -13.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and OVT?
IVV and OVT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OVT?
IVV and OVT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OVT?
IVV yields 1.10% while OVT yields 7.08%, so OVT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.