IVV vs PCK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs N/A
Which is better, IVV or PCK?
We do not have enough on IVV and PCK to separate them.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PCK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | - |
| AUM | $882.6B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | - |
| Holdings | 508 | - |
| YTD Price Return | +11.83% | - |
| 1Y Price Return | +14.22% | - |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Price Return (annualized) | +11.98% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II |
| Category | Equity | - |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | - |
Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for PCK. We have no price series for PCK, so there is nothing to compare it against.
IVV vs PCK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and N/A (PCK) is an ETF from PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund II.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PCK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is PCK better than IVV?
We hold very little data on IVV and PCK, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.