IVV vs PCS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PCS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $618M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 277 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | -0.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +1.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PGIM Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 29, 2025 |
IVV vs PCS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) is a ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while PCS returned +1.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a loss of 0.68% for PCS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.6% for PCS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.7% for PCS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PCS charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.38% for PCS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PCS share 1 holdings out of 688 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PCS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BK | 0.17% | 0.44% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PCS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PCS charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PCS?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +1.43% for PCS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +1.48% for PCS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PCS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.6% for PCS. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PCS -1.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and PCS?
IVV and PCS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PCS?
IVV and PCS share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 688 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PCS?
IVV yields 1.09% while PCS yields 4.38%, so PCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.