IVV vs PFFR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PFFR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $120M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 8.29% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 107 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +1.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +3.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +8.36% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +0.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -54.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 7, 2017 |
IVV vs PFFR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while PFFR returned +3.52%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 1.65% for PFFR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +8.36% for PFFR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +0.98% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +0.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PFFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -54.2% for PFFR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PFFR charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.29% for PFFR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PFFR share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PFFR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PFFR charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PFFR?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +3.52% for PFFR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +0.52% for PFFR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PFFR?
PFFR has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PFFR -54.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and PFFR?
IVV and PFFR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PFFR?
IVV and PFFR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PFFR?
IVV yields 1.09% while PFFR yields 8.29%, so PFFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.