IVV vs PMM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust
Which is better, IVV or PMM?
Large Cap Blend against Municipal Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $260M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.21% |
| Holdings | 508 | 403 |
| YTD Return | +13.60%Best | -4.90% |
| 1Y Return | +16.32%Best | -2.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81%Best | +7.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03%Best | -2.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -55.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279Best | $8,802 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 24, 1989 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Oct 2, 2026 (26.4 years).
IVV vs PMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs PMM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) is an ETF from Putnam Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% while PMM returned -2.07%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a loss of 4.90% for PMM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.81% per year against +7.82% for PMM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and -2.52% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -0.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for PMM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -55.5% for PMM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PMM charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $98 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.21% for PMM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 118 in PMM, totalling 99.9% and 45.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 103 days apart, IVV as of Sep 11, 2026 and PMM as of May 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 118 in PMM, against full books of 508 and 403.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and PMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PMM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PMM charges 0.98%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PMM?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% vs -2.07% for PMM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -0.82% for PMM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PMM?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for PMM. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PMM -55.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and PMM?
IVV and PMM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PMM?
IVV yields 1.06% while PMM yields 5.21%, so PMM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.