IVV vs PSCX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PSCX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $46M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +7.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +13.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +12.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +8.58% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 22, 2020 |
IVV vs PSCX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF (PSCX) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while PSCX returned +13.01%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 7.16% for PSCX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +12.60% for PSCX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +8.58% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, PSCX has the edge at +8.88% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.4% for PSCX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.2% for PSCX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PSCX charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for PSCX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PSCX share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PSCX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PSCX charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PSCX?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +13.01% for PSCX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +8.88% for PSCX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PSCX?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.4% for PSCX. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PSCX -10.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and PSCX?
IVV and PSCX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PSCX?
IVV and PSCX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PSCX?
IVV yields 1.09% while PSCX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.