IVV vs PSTP

IVV vs PSTP

Which is better, IVV or PSTP?

Large Cap Blend against Long-Short Strategy.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPSTP
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.89%
AUM$876.4B$132M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50812
YTD Return+12.39%Best+5.66%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+7.73%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best+11.15%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)15.8%8.2%Best
Max Drawdown-22.1%-12.5%Best
$10,000 over 4.5 years$19,463Best$14,598
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendLong-Short Strategy
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 7, 2022

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 8, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.5 years).

IVV vs PSTP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.

IVV vs PSTP Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Power Buffer Step Up Strategy ETF (PSTP) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while PSTP returned +7.73%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 5.66% for PSTP.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +11.15% for PSTP.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 8.2% for PSTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -12.5% for PSTP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PSTP charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $89 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PSTP.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and PSTP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVPSTP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PSTP?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PSTP charges 0.89%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or PSTP?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +7.73% for PSTP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or PSTP?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 8.2% for PSTP. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs PSTP -12.5%.

Should I hold both IVV and PSTP?

IVV and PSTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PSTP?

IVV yields 1.06% while PSTP yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PSTP better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.