IVV vs QBUL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QBUL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 8.85% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 15 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +1.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -6.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TrueShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 28, 2024 |
IVV vs QBUL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) is a ETF from TrueShares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while QBUL returned -6.02%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 1.64% for QBUL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.7% for QBUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.5% for QBUL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QBUL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 8.85% for QBUL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QBUL share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QBUL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QBUL charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QBUL?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -6.02% for QBUL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -1.00% for QBUL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QBUL?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.7% for QBUL. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QBUL -10.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QBUL?
IVV and QBUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QBUL?
IVV and QBUL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QBUL?
IVV yields 1.10% while QBUL yields 8.85%, so QBUL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.