IVV vs QCAP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QCAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $124M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +5.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +8.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 3.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -9.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 19, 2024 |
IVV vs QCAP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while QCAP returned +8.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 5.77% for QCAP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.9% for QCAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -9.2% for QCAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QCAP charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for QCAP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QCAP share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QCAP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QCAP charges 0.90%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QCAP?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +8.83% for QCAP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +10.21% for QCAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QCAP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.9% for QCAP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QCAP -9.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and QCAP?
IVV and QCAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QCAP?
IVV and QCAP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QCAP?
IVV yields 1.09% while QCAP yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.