IVV vs QIS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.21% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $37M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.02% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 245 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -30.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -49.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | -24.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -63.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Simplify Exchange Traded Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 10, 2023 |
IVV vs QIS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify Multi-QIS Alternative ETF (QIS) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while QIS returned -49.66%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 30.05% for QIS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against -24.22% for QIS. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -23.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -63.5% for QIS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QIS charges 1.21%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $121 annually, a gap of $118 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.02% for QIS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QIS share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QIS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QIS charges 1.21%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $118 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QIS?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -49.66% for QIS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -23.43% for QIS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QIS?
QIS has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QIS -63.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QIS?
IVV and QIS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QIS?
IVV and QIS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QIS?
IVV yields 1.09% while QIS yields 2.02%, so QIS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.