IVV vs QQQY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QQQY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQQY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.01% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $189M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 36.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +14.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +23.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +28.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -12.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 13, 2023 |
IVV vs QQQY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF (QQQY) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QQQY returned +23.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 14.79% for QQQY.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +28.05% for QQQY. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQY has the edge at +28.05% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -12.6% for QQQY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQQY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $101 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 36.53% for QQQY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQQY share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQQY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQY charges 1.01%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQQY?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +23.93% for QQQY, so QQQY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +28.05% for QQQY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQQY?
QQQY has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQQY -12.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQQY?
IVV and QQQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQQY?
IVV and QQQY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQQY?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQQY yields 36.53%, so QQQY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.