IVV vs REKT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bear 1X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | REKT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.51% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.99% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +2.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | -35.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 35.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -54.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 17, 2024 |
IVV vs REKT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bear 1X ETF (REKT) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while REKT returned -35.59%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 2.62% for REKT.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -54.9% for REKT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while REKT charges 0.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $51 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.99% for REKT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and REKT share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or REKT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while REKT charges 0.51%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or REKT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs -35.59% for REKT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -16.34% for REKT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or REKT?
REKT has been the more volatile fund at 35.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs REKT -54.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and REKT?
IVV and REKT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and REKT?
IVV and REKT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or REKT?
IVV yields 1.10% while REKT yields 3.99%, so REKT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.