IVV vs RGTX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RGTX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.29% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $68M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.67% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | -80.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | -72.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 239.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -98.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 31, 2025 |
IVV vs RGTX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% while RGTX returned -72.13%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 80.05% for RGTX.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGTX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 239.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -98.3% for RGTX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RGTX charges 1.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $129 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.67% for RGTX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RGTX share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RGTX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RGTX charges 1.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RGTX?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% vs -72.13% for RGTX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -33.20% for RGTX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RGTX?
RGTX has been the more volatile fund at 239.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RGTX -98.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and RGTX?
IVV and RGTX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RGTX?
IVV and RGTX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RGTX?
IVV yields 1.10% while RGTX yields 0.67%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.