IVV vs RING
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Which is better, IVV or RING?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, RING over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.37% |
| Holdings | 508 | 53 |
| YTD Return | +13.23%Best | +10.39% |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | +31.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.67% | +55.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | +28.91%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 38.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -80.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,531 | $35,599Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 66.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 31, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 24, 2026 (14.6 years).
IVV vs RING growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RING Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.38% while RING returned +31.96%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.23% versus a gain of 10.39% for RING.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.67% per year against +55.97% for RING; over five years the annualized figures are +13.13% and +28.91% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +3.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RING has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.6% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -80.2% for RING. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RING charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.37% for RING.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings RING also owns. 16.2% of RING's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
RING and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 41 in RING, against full books of 508 and 53.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for RING that do not appear in our book for IVV (5.5% of the fund), and 480 for IVV that do not appear in RING (98.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RING you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RING?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RING charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RING?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.38% vs +31.96% for RING, so RING leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IVV annualized +13.35% vs +3.86% for RING. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RING?
RING has been the more volatile fund at 38.6% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs RING -80.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and RING?
IVV and RING have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RING?
16.2% of RING's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.2% of RING's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 41 in RING.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RING?
IVV yields 1.06% while RING yields 1.37%, so RING currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RING better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, RING over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.