IVV vs RMOP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RMOP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.80% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $437M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.61% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 271 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +3.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +9.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 5.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -6.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Rockefeller Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 12, 2024 |
IVV vs RMOP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while RMOP returned +9.38%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 3.52% for RMOP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.5% for RMOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -6.8% for RMOP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RMOP charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $80 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.61% for RMOP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RMOP share 0 holdings out of 568 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RMOP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RMOP charges 0.80%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RMOP?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +9.38% for RMOP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +4.95% for RMOP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RMOP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.5% for RMOP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RMOP -6.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and RMOP?
IVV and RMOP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RMOP?
IVV and RMOP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 568 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RMOP?
IVV yields 1.09% while RMOP yields 5.61%, so RMOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.