IVV vs ROAM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ROAM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $107M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.37% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 327 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +21.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +36.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +22.36% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +11.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -48.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 25, 2015 |
IVV vs ROAM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while ROAM returned +36.27%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 21.04% for ROAM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +22.36% for ROAM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +11.33% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROAM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -48.6% for ROAM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROAM charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.37% for ROAM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ROAM share 1 holdings out of 830 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in ROAM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEL | 0.09% | 0.19% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROAM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROAM charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ROAM?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +36.27% for ROAM, so ROAM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +4.81% for ROAM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROAM?
ROAM has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ROAM -48.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROAM?
IVV and ROAM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROAM?
IVV and ROAM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 830 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROAM?
IVV yields 1.09% while ROAM yields 2.37%, so ROAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.