IVV vs RVNU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RVNU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $144M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.60% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 292 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +2.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +8.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +3.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | -0.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Xtrackers ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 4, 2013 |
IVV vs RVNU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Active ETF (RVNU) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while RVNU returned +8.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 2.38% for RVNU.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +3.85% for RVNU; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and -0.52% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +1.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.0% for RVNU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.5% for RVNU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RVNU charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.60% for RVNU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RVNU share 0 holdings out of 684 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RVNU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RVNU charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RVNU?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +8.56% for RVNU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +1.12% for RVNU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RVNU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.0% for RVNU. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RVNU -23.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and RVNU?
IVV and RVNU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RVNU?
IVV and RVNU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 684 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RVNU?
IVV yields 1.10% while RVNU yields 3.60%, so RVNU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.