IVV vs SCAP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Infrastructure Capital Small Cap Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SCAP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 2.20% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $20M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 7.58% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 85 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +11.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +25.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Infrastructure Capital Advisors, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 11, 2023 |
IVV vs SCAP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Infrastructure Capital Small Cap Income ETF (SCAP) is a ETF from Infrastructure Capital Advisors, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while SCAP returned +25.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 11.96% for SCAP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.1% for SCAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCAP charges 2.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $220 annually, a gap of $217 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 7.58% for SCAP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SCAP share 5 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCAP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCAP charges 2.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $217 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SCAP?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +25.50% for SCAP, so SCAP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +18.47% for SCAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCAP?
SCAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SCAP -24.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCAP?
IVV and SCAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SCAP?
IVV and SCAP share 5 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCAP?
IVV yields 1.09% while SCAP yields 7.58%, so SCAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.