IVV vs SCHC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or SCHC?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHC is less concentrated, with 3.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SCHC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.06% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 2,271 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +9.79% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +14.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +18.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51%Best | +6.68% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -47.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,844Best | $13,817 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 3.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 14, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 14, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.7 years).
IVV vs SCHC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SCHC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SCHC returned +14.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 9.79% for SCHC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +18.65% for SCHC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and +6.68% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.55% annualized vs +5.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -47.1% for SCHC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SCHC charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.27% for SCHC.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings SCHC also owns. 0.1% of SCHC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 2,147 in SCHC, against full books of 508 and 2,271.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for SCHC that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.1% of the fund), and 480 for IVV that do not appear in SCHC (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SCHC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SCHC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCHC charges 0.06%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SCHC?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +14.62% for SCHC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IVV annualized +12.55% vs +5.12% for SCHC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SCHC?
SCHC has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs SCHC -47.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SCHC?
IVV and SCHC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SCHC?
IVV yields 1.06% while SCHC yields 3.27%, so SCHC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHC is less concentrated, with 3.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.