IVV vs SETH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Short Ether ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SETH delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SETH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 9.88% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +30.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +49.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 65.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -80.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 2, 2023 |
IVV vs SETH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Short Ether ETF (SETH) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while SETH returned +49.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 30.40% for SETH.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SETH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -80.8% for SETH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SETH charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 9.88% for SETH.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SETH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SETH charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SETH?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +49.10% for SETH, so SETH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs -32.33% for SETH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SETH?
SETH has been the more volatile fund at 65.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SETH -80.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SETH?
IVV and SETH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SETH?
IVV yields 1.09% while SETH yields 9.88%, so SETH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.