IVV vs SETH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Short Ether ETF
Which is better, IVV or SETH?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SETH over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SETH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 29.99% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +1.56% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | +29.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 66.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -80.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $18,452Best | $2,609 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.9 years).
IVV vs SETH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SETH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Short Ether ETF (SETH) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while SETH returned +29.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 1.56% for SETH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SETH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 66.4% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -80.8% for SETH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SETH charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 29.99% for SETH.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SETH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SETH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SETH charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SETH?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +29.36% for SETH, so SETH leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SETH?
SETH has been the more volatile fund at 66.4% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SETH -80.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SETH?
IVV and SETH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SETH?
IVV yields 1.06% while SETH yields 29.99%, so SETH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SETH better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SETH over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.