IVV vs SGDM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SGDM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SGDM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.46% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $653M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 50 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +20.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +70.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +53.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +27.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 38.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -55.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Sprott ETFS | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 14, 2014 |
IVV vs SGDM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while SGDM returned +70.75%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 20.02% for SGDM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +53.80% for SGDM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +27.84% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SGDM has the edge at +11.54% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SGDM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -55.0% for SGDM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SGDM charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.18% for SGDM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SGDM share 1 holdings out of 553 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SGDM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 0.15% | 7.18% | 7.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SGDM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SGDM charges 0.46%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SGDM?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +70.75% for SGDM, so SGDM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +11.54% for SGDM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SGDM?
SGDM has been the more volatile fund at 38.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SGDM -55.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and SGDM?
IVV and SGDM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SGDM?
IVV and SGDM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 553 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SGDM?
IVV yields 1.10% while SGDM yields 1.18%, so SGDM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.