IVV vs SIJ

IVV vs SIJ

Which is better, IVV or SIJ?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.87, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSIJ
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.95%
AUM$876.4B$6M
Dividend Yield1.06%4.54%
Holdings5085
YTD Return+12.27%Best-13.93%
1Y Return+17.04%Best-20.92%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.24%Best-27.17%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.08%Best-18.20%
Volatility (annualized)15.5%Best38.0%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-
$10,000 over 5 years$18,490Best$3,662
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 30, 2007

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2007 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.6 years).

IVV vs SIJ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.6 years both funds cover.

IVV vs SIJ Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares UltraShort Industrials (SIJ) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while SIJ returned -20.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a loss of 13.93% for SIJ.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against -27.17% for SIJ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and -18.20% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.28% annualized vs -28.89%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SIJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.0% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.87. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SIJ charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.54% for SIJ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and SIJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVSIJ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SIJ?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SIJ charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or SIJ?

Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs -20.92% for SIJ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.28% vs -28.89% for SIJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or SIJ?

SIJ has been the more volatile fund at 38.0% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV.

Should I hold both IVV and SIJ?

IVV and SIJ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.87, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SIJ?

IVV yields 1.06% while SIJ yields 4.54%, so SIJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SIJ better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.87, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.