IVV vs SIXJ

IVV vs SIXJ

Which is better, IVV or SIXJ?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSIXJ
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.74%
AUM$876.4B$151M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings5085
YTD Return+12.39%Best+8.58%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+12.10%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best+14.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)15.6%8.5%Best
Max Drawdown-24.5%-14.1%Best
$10,000 over 4.7 years$17,020Best$14,781
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)AllianzIM
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 31, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.7 years).

IVV vs SIXJ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.

IVV vs SIXJ Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SIXJ returned +12.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 8.58% for SIXJ.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +14.16% for SIXJ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 8.5% for SIXJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -14.1% for SIXJ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SIXJ charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $74 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for SIXJ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and SIXJ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVSIXJ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SIXJ?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SIXJ charges 0.74%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or SIXJ?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +12.10% for SIXJ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or SIXJ?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 8.5% for SIXJ. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs SIXJ -14.1%.

Should I hold both IVV and SIXJ?

IVV and SIXJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SIXJ?

IVV yields 1.06% while SIXJ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SIXJ better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.