IVV vs SNTH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MRP SynthEquity ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNTH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.96% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $252M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 11.62% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +11.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +21.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -9.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Measured Risk Portfolios | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 10, 2025 |
IVV vs SNTH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MRP SynthEquity ETF (SNTH) is a ETF from Measured Risk Portfolios. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while SNTH returned +21.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 11.75% for SNTH.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.2% for SNTH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -9.8% for SNTH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNTH charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 11.62% for SNTH.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SNTH share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNTH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNTH charges 0.96%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SNTH?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +21.36% for SNTH, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +25.65% for SNTH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNTH?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.2% for SNTH. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SNTH -9.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNTH?
IVV and SNTH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNTH?
IVV and SNTH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNTH?
IVV yields 1.09% while SNTH yields 11.62%, so SNTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.