IVV vs SPBU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SPBU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $174M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 13 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +9.55% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +16.41% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -8.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianzIM | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 5, 2025 |
IVV vs SPBU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) is a ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while SPBU returned +16.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 9.55% for SPBU.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.2% for SPBU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -8.3% for SPBU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SPBU charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for SPBU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SPBU share 0 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SPBU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPBU charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SPBU?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +16.41% for SPBU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +16.77% for SPBU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SPBU?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.2% for SPBU. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SPBU -8.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and SPBU?
IVV and SPBU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SPBU?
IVV and SPBU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SPBU?
IVV yields 1.09% while SPBU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.