IVV vs SRET
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $230M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 7.87% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +7.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +12.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +11.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +3.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -67.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 16, 2015 |
IVV vs SRET Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while SRET returned +12.86%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 7.30% for SRET.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +11.91% for SRET; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +3.02% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -67.7% for SRET. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRET charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 7.87% for SRET.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SRET share 1 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SRET | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VICI | 0.04% | 3.13% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRET?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRET charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SRET?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +12.86% for SRET, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -2.37% for SRET. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRET?
SRET has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SRET -67.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SRET?
IVV and SRET have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRET?
IVV and SRET share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRET?
IVV yields 1.10% while SRET yields 7.87%, so SRET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.