IVV vs STXT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strive Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STXT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $119M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.07% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 219 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | -0.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +0.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +3.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 5.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -5.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strive Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 10, 2023 |
IVV vs STXT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while STXT returned +0.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a loss of 0.29% for STXT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +3.77% for STXT. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.5% for STXT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -5.8% for STXT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.07% for STXT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and STXT share 0 holdings out of 652 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STXT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXT charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or STXT?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +0.99% for STXT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +3.77% for STXT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or STXT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.5% for STXT. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs STXT -5.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and STXT?
IVV and STXT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STXT?
IVV and STXT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 652 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXT?
IVV yields 1.09% while STXT yields 5.07%, so STXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.