IVV vs TACK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF
Which is better, IVV or TACK?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 99.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TACK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $289M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 22 |
| YTD Return | +14.84%Best | +7.31% |
| 1Y Return | +18.70%Best | +8.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.93%Best | +13.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.91% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 10.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $18,770Best | $13,592 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 99.7% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Capitol Series Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 22, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 23, 2022 to Oct 13, 2026 (4.6 years).
IVV vs TACK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TACK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF (TACK) is an ETF from Capitol Series Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% while TACK returned +8.49%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.84% versus a gain of 7.31% for TACK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.93% per year against +13.10% for TACK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 10.2% for TACK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -14.5% for TACK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TACK charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.27% for TACK.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 10 in TACK, totalling 99.9% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 10 in TACK, against full books of 508 and 22.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for TACK that do not appear in our book for IVV (99.7% of the fund), and 497 for IVV that do not appear in TACK (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TACK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TACK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TACK charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TACK?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.70% vs +8.49% for TACK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TACK?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 10.2% for TACK. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs TACK -14.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and TACK?
IVV and TACK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TACK?
IVV yields 1.06% while TACK yields 1.27%, so TACK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TACK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 99.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.