IVV vs TACK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $289M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.31% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +8.86% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +15.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +12.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Capitol Series Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 22, 2022 |
IVV vs TACK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF (TACK) is a ETF from Capitol Series Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while TACK returned +15.22%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 8.86% for TACK.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +12.84% for TACK. Across the full 4-year window we track, TACK has the edge at +7.54% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.2% for TACK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.5% for TACK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TACK charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.31% for TACK.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TACK share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TACK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TACK charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TACK?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +15.22% for TACK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +7.54% for TACK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TACK?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.2% for TACK. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TACK -14.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and TACK?
IVV and TACK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TACK?
IVV and TACK share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TACK?
IVV yields 1.09% while TACK yields 1.31%, so TACK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.