IVV vs TCHI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
Which is better, IVV or TCHI?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.30% |
| Holdings | 508 | 196 |
| YTD Return | +12.24%Best | -6.50% |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | -4.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +11.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 31.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1%Best | -44.0% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $17,942Best | $9,895 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 40.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 25, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2022 to Sep 9, 2026 (4.6 years).
IVV vs TCHI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TCHI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while TCHI returned -4.38%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a loss of 6.50% for TCHI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +11.68% for TCHI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCHI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.9% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -44.0% for TCHI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TCHI charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.30% for TCHI.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings TCHI also owns. 0.1% of TCHI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 190 in TCHI, against full books of 508 and 196.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for TCHI that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.0% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in TCHI (99.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TCHI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.18% | 0.08% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TCHI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TCHI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TCHI charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TCHI?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs -4.38% for TCHI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TCHI?
TCHI has been the more volatile fund at 31.9% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs TCHI -44.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and TCHI?
IVV and TCHI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TCHI?
IVV yields 1.06% while TCHI yields 2.30%, so TCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.