IVV vs TINS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin Templeton International Insights ETF
Which is better, IVV or TINS?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. TINS is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TINS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.21% |
| Holdings | 508 | 55 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +10.08% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 32.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 21, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TINS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TINS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Franklin Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while TINS returned +15.23%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 10.08% for TINS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TINS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.21% for TINS.
Holdings Overlap
2.1% of TINS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
TINS and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in TINS, against full books of 508 and 55.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for TINS that do not appear in our book for IVV (6.6% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in TINS (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TINS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWR:IESmurfit Westrock Plc | 0.04% | 2.10% | 2.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TINS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TINS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TINS charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TINS?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +15.23% for TINS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TINS?
2.1% of TINS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.1% of TINS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in TINS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TINS?
IVV yields 1.06% while TINS yields 0.21%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TINS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. TINS is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.