IVV vs TISC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Thrivent International Small Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or TISC?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TISC is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TISC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $876.4B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | - |
| Holdings | 508 | 598 |
| YTD Return | +12.24%Best | +2.01% |
| 1Y Return | +18.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 7.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Thrivent Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 15, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TISC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TISC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Thrivent International Small Cap ETF (TISC) is an ETF from Thrivent Funds. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 2.01% for TISC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TISC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 591 in TISC, totalling 100.0% and 98.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 591 in TISC, against full books of 508 and 598.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for TISC that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.5% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in TISC (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TISC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TISC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TISC charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Is TISC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TISC is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.